READ IT IN GREEK HERE - Council Estate UK Banter and memes which has 103k members
- https://x.com/I_amMukhtar/status/1680233414618750977 Basant Khedia @Basant_Khedia 135.8k Followers
- https://x.com/Basant_Khedia/status/1803721813727347186 @IslamInvasion 151.8k Followers
- https://www.instagram.com/godalanvampire/ 5,249 followers
- https://x.com/IslamInvasion/status/1936819217048928474 which has 103 thousand Reactions
- https://x.com/realMaalouf/status/2019802686858670351 which has 207 thousand Reactions
- @realMaalouf 413.9k Followers
- @I_amMukhtar 135.8k Followers
Respect Religions - Respect Religions
.jpg)
Respect Religions - Respect ReligionsHaving a religion is a Right!!!Respecting the religion of others is an obligation!!!Respecting the religious symbols of others is an obligation!!!Respect for the religion of others creates the demand that the other person also respect your religion!!!Respect for religion and democracy is also the basic principle of
Greeksand makes it special as a Nation!!!Articles, photos and videos that are disrespectful or criticize or insult ANY religion and any religious symbol are strictly prohibited at Grmagazin!!!✅ I strongly disagree with (Generalized) Islamophobia
✅ I strongly disagree with the fact that Islam is a dangerous religion
✅ I strongly disagree with the fact that if someone is Muslim, it also implies that they are also dangerous.
✅ At GR magazin we ABSOLUTELY defend Islam as a religion and Muslims from the ⛔ Extremist Islamist Islamofascists who want to impose theirs with Violence
Read and agree to the Terms of Use of our articles HERE
HEADLINE TITLE
Poor Muslim refugees or Mass Islamic Immigration or invasion of Europe? Reactions from 1,000,000 Europeans and Americans on social media
Research analysis 30 pages and proposal for a realistic solution to the migration problem in Europe
Poor Muslim Refugees or Mass Islamic Immigration or Invasion of Europe? Reactions from 1,000,000 Europeans and Americans on Social Media
30-page research analysis and proposal for a Realistic solution to immigration in Europe
Poor Muslim refugees or Mass Islamic Migration or invasion of Europe?
- IS IT THAT Europe suffers more and more from immigrants from Islamic countries every year?
- Has European public opinion now ceased to be on the side of immigrants from Islamic countries?
- HOWEVER, we have observed a HUGE turn against immigrants from Islamic countries,
- HAVE immigrants from Islamic countries, with their aggressive behavior, caused Islamophobia in Europe?
- HAVE immigrants from Islamic countries, with their aggressive behavior, created a rise in the far right?
- HAVE Europeans stopped believing that they are poor immigrants, but that they are coming to wage Islamic immigration and Islamic war in Europe, just like Muhammad did with Mecca and Medina (we don't say it, they constantly advertise it)???
- Politicians must act NOW, otherwise they risk losing their seats and having their political positions taken over by far-right parties.
- That they pray ostentatiously in public dances with tsambukas, obstructing traffic? (Why do they have the impression that in Europe too, Islamic Sharia law is above state law? Just as it happens in the states from which they came, states ruled by Islamists?)
- What causes riots and clashes?
- That they invade, rob, burn down stores?
- That they rob and attack EU citizens? (multiple videos)
- That they harass, terrorize, rape women? (multiple videos)
- That they threaten women and demand Islamic dress, disrespecting the laws of the host state? (multiple videos)
- That they have become the nightmare of women in Europe (multiple videos)
- That they burn Christian churches?
- That they burn Christmas markets?
- Why do they burn Christmas trees? (multiple videos)
- That they are encouraged to create Islamic armed organizations (even by Islamic priests)?
- That they threaten to kill anyone who is not a Muslim if they do not convert to Islam with the excuse that this is a sacred duty?
- That they are blatantly threatening to sooner or later kill all Christians in Europe because they will dominate due to demographics?
- That they are trying to IMPOSE Islam in Europe through violence and weapons, as is often done in states ruled by Islam?
- That in whatever part of the world Islam dominated, they then genocided all Christians (unshakable historical evidence, mistakes, numbers)?
- That in whatever part of the world Islam now dominates, they are now genocideing all Christians (unwavering journalistic evidence, videos, testimonies, interviews)?
- That in any part of the world where Islam now dominates, Christians are executed and women are either burned or turned into sex workers? with the excuse that they are Christians and since they are in a state dominated by Islam, they simply have to be executed like dogs?
Should we "act like everything is fine" and turn a blind eye so they don't accuse us of being right-wing extremists???
No — we shouldn't "pretend everything is fine"
❌ Europe has no obligation:
- to tolerate violence
- to tolerate religious coercion
- to turn a blind eye to crime
- to sacrifice women's rights, free speech, or public safety
This is not racism . This is the rule of law .
No, nothing should be ignored . But neither should we put everything in one bag. Let's go clear, without embellishment and without demonization.
This question is asked by European citizens because of the myriad of suffering that has been caused by the uncontrolled influx of Muslims into Europe and uses three different terms that appear frequently in public debate, but have very different connotations and meanings . Let's look at them more objectively:
1️⃣ "Poor Muslim refugees"
➡️ This term is usually used for people who:
- They are fleeing wars (e.g. Syria, Afghanistan, Iran)
- They are fleeing political persecution or extreme poverty.
- They are seeking asylum under international law.
✔ It is a legal and humanitarian term when talking about refugees
✔ It does not apply to all immigrants nor to all Muslims
2️⃣ "Mass Islamic Migration"
➡️ This is more of a political/social characterization that: Describes increased migration flows from countries with Muslim populations and is used in discussions about:
- demographic changes
- integration of immigrants
- social policies
✔ There is statistical evidence that migration flows to Europe increased after 2014–2016
✔ It does not necessarily mean an organized process
3️⃣ "Islamic invasion of Europe"
➡️ This is a very loaded and ideological term .
- Usually used in political or propaganda speech
- It implies an organized plan of conquest.
- It is not a term used in academic, legal or international analysis.
✅ The reality is more complex and includes:
- wars in the Middle East
- economic inequalities
- EU political decisions
- migrant smuggling networks
- demographic developments
- integration and social cohesion issues
I will explain it to you in more detail: in a more complete report
So let's "blend" them together — and only in this way can a more complete and realistic picture emerge . Let's unite them into a single, clear report , without slogans.
Single report: Refugees & Mass Migration from Muslim countries to Europe
Migration flows to Europe in recent decades have largely come from countries with a Muslim majority population. This is not due to religion per se , but to a combination of factors:
🔹 A. Humanitarian reasons (Refugees), Many of these people are:
- war refugees (Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan)
- victims of civil wars, Islamist violence or authoritarian regimes
- people entitled to asylum under international law
➡️ This category actually exists and is real .
🔹 B. Economic & demographic migration Simultaneously:
- There is mass economic migration.
- Many do not meet the asylum criteria
- They use refugee flows as a "vehicle" of entry
- There are organized networks of traffickers
➡️ This burdens host states and blurs the refugee-immigrant distinction.
🔹 C. European policies & consequences
The EU:
- did not predict the size of the flows in time
- did not have a common return policy
- left frontline countries (e.g. Greece, Italy) exposed
Result:
- social tensions
- integration problems
- ghettoization in certain areas
- rise of political radicalism (on both sides)
🔹 D. What it is not
❌ There is no proven plan for an "Islamic invasion" in the sense of a military or coordinated conquest
❌ Not all Muslims are the same
❌ Not all refugees are "innocent", but neither are they "enemies"
📌 Conclusion
The reality lies between the two extremes:
- ✔ There are real refugees who need protection
- ✔ There is massive, uncontrolled immigration with serious social consequences
- ❌ The term "invasion" is political and emotional, not analytical
What is a real problem (and should be called)
✔ There are:
- Islamist extremist networks in Europe
- crimes by immigrants (as well as by locals, but disproportionately in some groups)
- pressure on women (forced headscarf, threats)
- attacks on churches, Christmas sites, symbols
- ghetto where the state has withdrawn
➡️ All of this must be dealt with harshly and without fear .
The critical point (this is where the mistake happens)
The problem is not that they are Muslims . The problem is when:
- reject the secular state
- they do not accept the laws of the country
- they consider sharia law superior to the Constitution
- use religion for violence or intimidation
👉 This is called Islamic fundamentalism , not "immigration in general".
There are millions of Muslims in Europe who:
- they work
- respect the laws
- they don't want any "imposition of Islam"
- they are afraid of the extremists themselves
What not to do
❌ Pretending that nothing is happening (political cowardice)
❌ Labeling every criticism "Islamophobia"
❌ Equating everyone with extremists (this fuels chaos)
What should be done (realistically)
✔ Zero tolerance:
- in violence
- in religious coercion
- in parallel "Islamic laws"
- to extremist organizations
✔ Immediate deportations:
- for crimes, vandalism, violence (revocation of residence permit, immediate deportation)
- for terrorism or incitement to violence
- for inciting Islamic expansionism
- for violence against Christians, vandalism of Christian symbols, churches, representatives (e.g. burning a Christmas tree, kicking Santa Claus (revocation of residence permit, immediate deportation)
- Enforcement of Sharia laws by force (revocation of residence permit, immediate deportation)
✔ Mandatory acceptance:
- Syntagma
- gender equality
- freedom of religion (and apostasy)
If someone does not accept them , then they do not belong to European society . It's that simple.
Conclusion (without fear and without silencing)
You should not:
- nor should we be silent
- nor should we be fanatics
Europe is at risk not from refugees , but from:
- failure to enforce the law
- political hypocrisy
- fear of calling things by their proper name
You propose as a realistic solution: a new European legislative policy that could be implemented immediately, perhaps.
Yes — I propose it as a realistic solution , not as a slogan. And not a general wish, but a specific European legislative shift that could be implemented immediately if there was political will. Let's get practical 👇
🔹 A realistic NEW European Immigration & Insurance Policy
1️⃣ European oath of acceptance of the Constitution & values
Not formal. Legally binding .
📌 Prerequisite for:
- asylum
- residence permit
- family reunion
It explicitly includes:
- supremacy of secular law
- gender equality
- criminal conviction of religious coercion
- complete freedom of apostasy
➡️ Violation = removal of residence status
2️⃣ Zero tolerance for violence & religious extremism
Single European list:
- radical imams
- organizations
- financial networks
📌 This means:
- Closing mosques that incite hatred (Immediate expulsion of those responsible)
- criminalization of sharia courts (immediate deportation of those responsible)
- deportations without "eternal" appeals (Immediate deportation of those inciting violence)
➡️ Safety first, ideology later.
3️⃣ Direct discrimination between refugee and economic migrant
⏱️ Within 3–6 months, not years.
- Reject = automatic return
- European agreements with third countries
- Common refund system (not Greece alone)
👉 This massively reduces flows. It's proven.
4️⃣ Mandatory membership — not “anyone who wants to”
No symbolic courses. Mandatory:
- language
- history
- laws
- women's rights
📌 Failure = loss of benefits/leave
➡️ Integration is not a right without obligations .
5️⃣ End the ghettos
The biggest bomb.
- dissolution of parallel societies
- police presence
- application of the law without "cultural exceptions"
➡️ Where there is a state, extremism does not flourish .
❗ Is it feasible or a utopia?
- ✔ Legal: YES
- ✔ Technically: YES
- ❌ Political: NO (yet)
Not because it can't be implemented.
But because:
- they fear the political cost
- they confuse humanity with tolerance for chaos
- they let the extremes monopolize the discussion
🧭 Final conclusion (without evasions)
Europe has two options :
1️⃣ Rule of law for all, without exceptions
2️⃣ Continuous decomposition with embellished language
There is no third way. but I will tell you which countries are going in this direction.
Yes — indeed, in several countries in Europe there are changes in migration policy that move towards tighter management, security and control (albeit with different approaches and goals). There is no single model that all countries agree on, but many see the changes as a necessary part of their response to migratory pressure, social issues and political costs.
Below are some of the most important cases of policies moving in the direction you describe :
🇸🇪 Sweden — Tightening policy
The government has promoted measures that:
- increase the requirements for naturalization
- increase residence requirements and integration conditions
- reduce dependence on social benefits
- seek to reduce asylum applications and encourage return
- These changes have led to a significant drop in asylum applications and are considered among the strictest immigration reforms in Europe.
🇩🇰 Denmark — Legislation on deportations and crime control
Denmark has adopted a reform that:
- allows the deportation of foreign nationals convicted of serious crimes
- introduces stricter controls on irregular migrants and monitoring measures
- seeks to use more decisive expulsion tools, even if there is a conflict with European conventions
- This marks a clear shift towards security and control.
🇳🇱 Netherlands — Entry control measures
The Dutch government had presented a very strict package of measures that includes:
- reintroduction of internal border controls
- restrictions on family reunification
- tightening of asylum rules
- This is considered one of the strictest policy frameworks in the bloc.
🇦🇹 Austria — Asylum restrictions and family reunifications
Austria plans to:
- impose permanent restrictions on asylum rights
- introduce a system of quotas or even zero family reunifications
- The plan has caused reactions regarding its compatibility with European law but shows a clear tendency towards restrictions.
🇩🇪 Germany — Coordination with other countries for stricter controls
Germany, as the EU's largest economy, has taken a more stringent stance with:
- increased deportations
- insistence on returns to countries of origin
- participation in joint European initiatives for more effective management
- There is also a common agreement between ministers from six countries for an even stricter line on pushbacks and returns.
🧩 European level — Agreements for a tighter asylum policy
At EU level:
- An agreement was reached on a list of safe countries of origin , allowing for faster processing and possible rejections for people from these countries without protection.
- New frameworks for more efficient asylum and border management procedures are being promoted.
❗ Important note
Not all countries are in the same direction:
➡️ Spain has announced greater legalization and integration of immigrants, not stricter measures, with a plan to legalize around 500,000 people.
So there is a difference in strategy in Europe: some states choose stricter management and control, while others are oriented towards integration policies — a sign that the issue was, is and will remain politically and socially divisive .
If you want, I can show you how these measures practically affect society, security, and the economy in each country. Do you want such an analysis?
Greece is a hub not because of ideology , but because of geography, legal status, and political choices . If you look at it calmly, it is almost a “perfect hub” of migration flows. Here’s why:
1️⃣ Geography: the door to Europe
Greece:
- has thousands of kilometers of maritime borders
- it is a few miles from Turkey
- has dozens of first-line islands
➡️ For anyone who wants to enter the EU, Greece is the easiest point of entry .
And once you enter a Schengen country, you have theoretically entered Europe .
2️⃣ Turkey: the real regulator
Without Turkey, the problem would be orders of magnitude smaller .
- hosts millions of refugees/migrants
- controls the circuits or "leaves" them on as appropriate
- uses immigration as a lever to pressure the EU and Greece
➡️ When Turkey "turns on the tap", Greece receives a wave .
3️⃣ Dublin Regulation: the trap
According to the European system:
- the country of first entry is responsible for asylum
- refunds are made (or should be) there
➡️ So Greece:
- keeps the population
- pays the cost
- accepts social pressure
Northern countries benefit without being on the front lines.
4️⃣ Weak and slow process
For years:
- asylum that lasted 2–5 years
- minimum returns
- "temporary" hospitality that became permanent
- lack of control after entry
➡️ This sends a message:
"Come in – something will happen"
And the trafficking networks know it.
5️⃣ Greece = filter or parking space?
Here is the crucial question:
Greece today operates:
- ❌ not as a filter
- ✔ but as a parking lot for people
Most don't want to stay .
They want Northern Europe.
But:
- they cannot leave legally
- they are not easily returned
- are trapped
➡️ This creates tension , ghettos, illegality.
6️⃣ Why it concerns all of Europe (not just us)
If Greece:
- implement strict control
- quick asylum decision
- real returns
➡️ flows are decreasing across Europe . If not:
➡️ Greece is becoming a test tube of failure .
That's why everyone talks about Greece, even if they pretend not to see it.
🔚 Conclusion (raw and clear)
Greece is a key point because it is:
- EU border
- dependent on a third country (Turkey)
- tied to European rules that do not help it
- and politically pressured to "maintain balance"
Whatever happens here:
- either succeed
- either fails
➡️ it will affect all of Europe .
What will happen if we continue as we are now?
If we continue as we are now , without a substantial change of course, then – realistically, not risk-wise – the most likely scenario for Greece (and by extension Europe) is this 👇
1️⃣ Permanent pressure on the borders (not a "crisis", normality)
- The flows: will not be zeroed out
- The flows: will rise and fall depending on Turkey, wars, smugglers
Greece will live in a permanent state of management , not solution.
- ➡️This exhausts: port
- ➡️This is exhausting: police
- ➡️This exhausts:t optical societies
- ➡️This depletes: state budget
2️⃣ Population confinement & ghettoization
- As long as: the procedures are slow
- As long as: returns are few
- Meanwhile: the legal exit to the North is closed
➡️ more people stay here without prospects .
- This leads to: informal settlements
- This leads to: run-down neighborhoods
- This leads to: parallel communities
- This leads to: an increase in petty and medium crime
It's not "racism." It's social physics.
3️⃣ Limb raises (on both sides)
- When the state: does not control
- When the state: does not explain
- When the state: does not enforce rules
➡️ the void is filled by the edges.
- You will see: more violence
- You will see: greater polarization
- You will see: normalization of hate speech
- You will see: loss of cool dialogue
And this destabilizes democracy .
4️⃣ Declining social cohesion
- Slowly: citizens are losing trust in the state
- Little by little: "everyone for themselves" is being reinforced
- Slowly: tolerance is decreasing, even towards those who join in
➡️ Society is becoming more closed, more fearful, more cruel.
5️⃣ Greece as a "warehouse of souls"
- Unless something changes fundamentally: Greece is becoming a parking lot
- Unless something changes substantially: not as an accession country
- If nothing changes substantially: not even as a filter
- They don't want this: not even the Greeks
- They don't want this: neither do the immigrants
- They don't want this: neither (in practice) do the European partners
6️⃣ Long term: difficult choices
Sooner or later, if there is no change:
- or will a tougher policy be imposed under pressure/crisis
- or there will be a social explosion
- or the EU will be forced to change rules… too late
Historically, societies always pay more dearly when they delay difficult decisions.
🔚 Conclusion (without dramatization)
If we continue as we are now:
- ❌ We are not "destroyed tomorrow"
- ✔ but we are slowly eroding the state, society and democracy
It is the worst option: neither humanitarian, nor safe, nor sustainable.
If you want, the next logical step is:
- which scenario would be the least bad?
- or what Greece can realistically do on its own
- or what would force the EU to act
Good question — because the EU is not driven by appeals or “logical arguments” , but by pressure, cost and fear of destabilization . If we look at it coldly, these are the things that would really force it to move:
1️⃣ When the problem hits the "core", not the periphery
The EU only moves when the powerful are burned .
- Not when pressured: Greece
- Not when pressed: Italy
- Not when pressed: Spain
- But when pressed: Germany,
- But when pressed: France
- But when pressed: Netherlands
- But when pressed: Austria
➡️ Then immigration ceases to be a "humanitarian issue"
➡️ it becomes an internal security issue .
(This is already starting to happen.)
2️⃣ When Greece stops "absorbing" the shock
Harsh but true:
- The EU is based on the fact that: Greece holds people
- The EU is based on: decompressing the North
- The EU is based on: paying the social cost
But if Greece:
- speeds up decisions
- increase returns
- stop silent storage
➡️ the pressure rises north
➡️ and then they are forced to negotiate.
3️⃣ Threat of Schengen collapse (the biggest fear)
Schengen is a sacred totem for the EU.
- When: internal controls are reinstated
- When: borders between states are closed
- When: free movement freezes
➡️ The heart of the Union beats .
- Therefore: every time Schengen is in danger
- Therefore: the EU is forced to take steps (even if only half)
4️⃣ Mass political upheaval (election fear)
The EU is not afraid of protests. It is afraid of elections .
- When: anti-systemic parties rise
- When: governability is threatened
- When: centrist parties lose control
➡️ then suddenly:
- the rhetoric changes
- "discover" the need for control
- they pass measures that they previously considered "unthinkable"
5️⃣ Instrumentalization by third countries (Turkey, etc.)
When it is clearly demonstrated that:
- immigration is used as a hybrid weapon
- states open/close it at will
➡️ then the issue ceases to be humanitarian, it becomes geopolitical and defensive . And there the EU cannot play the naive one .
6️⃣ A serious shock event
Historically, the EU has been driven by:
- great crisis
- serious episode
- something that cannot be "hooded"
It's not a wish — it's an observation. ➡️ Unfortunately, it often takes a shock to make change happen.
🔚 Conclusion (raw but honest)
The EU will act not because “Greece is right” , but when:
- the cost becomes greater than the political risk
- the pressure passes from the periphery to the core
- basic structures are threatened (Schengen, stability, elections)
Until then, it will:
- small steps
- statements
- temporary patches
If you want, the next step is:
- What could Greece do smartly to cause this pressure?
- or what is the most likely scenario within the next 5–10 years
- or where is the limit before the system "breaks"
Where should we take it? What could Greece do smartly to cause this pressure?
Good question — and the word “smartly” is important here . Not unilateral blunders, not violations of law (which would backfire), but moves that shift the costs to the core of the EU .
Here's a realistic "pressure toolbox" 👇
1️⃣ Stop acting as a silent "cushion"
Greece should not absorb the pressure on behalf of others .
- Practical: faster asylum decisions (yes/no in months, not years)
- Practical: actual returns of rejected items
- Practical: end to informal tolerance of remaining "in the air"
➡️ This is not cruelty . It is enforcement of rules. And it sends a message to the EU:
"We will not hold populations indefinitely for your comfort."
2️⃣ Legal and political pressure on Dublin
Greece can (and should):
- to demand a formal review of Dublin
- to frame the issue as structural inequality , not a "Greek problem"
- to threaten institutions with unsustainable implementation
No voices — institutional conflict . ➡️ The EU only changes when its rules are not “put into practice” .
3️⃣ Frontline alliance (not Greece alone)
Greece alone shouts. With others, it imposes .:
- Target permanent bloc: Greece – Italy – Malta – Cyprus – Spain
- Target common requirements
- Aim for joint veto on unrelated European issues if necessary
➡️ The EU operates on transaction . Not on understanding.
4️⃣ Immigration connection with Schengen & security
This is where it hurts. Greece can say clearly:
- "without a common return policy, Schengen does not stand"
- "we cannot guarantee secondary movements"
➡️ This directly touches the North . It is not a threat. It is a warning of reality.
5️⃣ Internationalization of Turkey's role
Not emotionally — but factually .
- data
- patterns
- timings
- statements
➡️ Prove that the immigration:
- it's not "misfortune"
- but pressure tool
When this is politically enshrined, the context changes:
from humanitarian → geopolitical
And there the EU is forced to act.
6️⃣ Transparency towards European citizens
Not just to governments.
- real numbers
- real cost
- real impacts on local communities
➡️ When voters in the North see that "Greece is holding out so that the problem doesn't reach us" then the pressure rises from below upwards .
7️⃣ Clear internal line (no double messages)
- Greece must show: respect for asylum
- Greece must broadcast: zero tolerance for illegality
- Greece must broadcast: rules that apply
➡️ This:
- cuts off the work of traffickers
- removes the EU's alibi ("Greece cannot")
🔚 Conclusion
Greece does not need to become a “bad guy” . It needs to become a serious, predictable and stable player . The pressure on the EU comes when:
- the cost is transferred
- the rules don't seem to work
- the region ceases to be silent
If you want, which of these is the next step, namely, which one is more realistic immediately, and we are talking about immediately realistic (i.e.: it can start in months , without changing the EU Treaty and without "blowing up" the country), then the answer is clear:
🥇 The most realistic directly:
1️⃣ Faster asylum decisions + real returns
This is the pressure lever key . Why?
- ✅ done with national legislation & administration
- ✅ does not require approval from 27 countries
- ✅ cuts off the message "come in and see"
- ✅ increases the cost to traffickers
- ✅ and automatically transfers pressure to the EU
📌 When rejections actually lead to returns , flows drop.
This has been proven everywhere.
🥈 Second most realistic:
2️⃣ Clear, single internal line (no more duplicate messages)
Not window-shop laws. Implementation .
- ➡️ same rule everywhere
- ➡️ no "cultural exception"
- ➡️ zero tolerance for violence, threats, ghettos
- ➡️ This: removes the argument "Greece does not control" from the EU
- ➡️ This: gives legitimacy to tougher negotiation
🥉 Third, but it takes a little preparation:
3️⃣ Frontline Alliance (Greece–Italy–Malta–Cyprus)
It can't be done in a week, but:
- ➡️ it happens in months
- ➡️ without change of Conditions
- ➡️ with common positions & blockages
➡️ When 4–5 countries speak together, the EU listens differently .
❌ What is NOT realistic right now
To be honest:
- ❌ Dublin change → slow & politically heavy
- ❌ threats to Schengen → dangerous without preparation
- ❌ unilateral conflicts → boomerang
These come only after the first ones are implemented.
🔚 Conclusion (one sentence)
If Greece does asylum quickly + real returns + clear law enforcement , then:
- 👉 flows are decreasing
- 👉 the EU is under pressure
- 👉 and Greece gains negotiating power
Without shouting. Without heroics. With results.
If something is not done immediately in Europe with the immigration issue, we will have a rapid strengthening of the far right in Europe, because there is a lot of pressure and anxiety and a change in the attitude of citizens!!!
Based on the data and trends of recent years , if something is not done immediately to control immigrants and migration flows, security and asylum management , it is very likely that we will see today's politicians lose their seats and a rapid strengthening of the far right in Europe . And I explain why, step by step:
1️⃣ The logic of political reaction
The far right thrives when there is a sense of state weakness .
What does this mean in practice:
- slow or ineffective asylum decisions
- entrapment of immigrants without prospects
- increase in crime or irregularities
- uncontrolled ghettos
➡️ The citizen sees "the state does not control".
➡️ The far right says: "We will protect them".
Historically, each such period raises the percentage of far-right parties by 5–10% or more within a few years .
2️⃣ Trends today
- Scandinavia: far-right rises where they are unable to reduce asylum applications.
- Germany: AfD rose after 2015–2016, when citizens felt pressure from a mass influx of immigrants.
- Italy / Austria / Netherlands: the far right consistently exploits "insecurity + uncontrolled immigration".
➡️ The pattern is clear: if management does not change, their rates will steadily increase .
3️⃣ Greece as a mirror
If Greece does not immediately implement control measures and quick decisions :
- citizens will see the failure of the state
- the media will show daily problems across Europe
- The far right in the North will say: "See what happens if you don't control it?"
➡️ A domino effect of strengthening the far right is being created in all countries .
4️⃣ The psychology of the electorate
Citizens vote emotionally when they feel:
- fear for safety
- threat to culture/identity
- feeling that politicians are not in control of the situation
➡️ The far right exploits these three elements with great precision .
5️⃣ Conclusion
- If there is no immediate, realistic and effective action (faster asylum + real returns + clear implementation of the law):
- ✅ The far right will rapidly strengthen in many EU countries within a few years.
- If Greece and other frontline countries take action , they can stop or limit this wave.
*** If you want, I can create a 5–10 year scenario for Europe , with or without immediate action, to see how the political balance and the far right change . Write in the comments below what you want us to do? HERE
( *Islamists rule them) = There, only the Islamofascist law is in force, which is also the law of the state or is above the law of the state, and above the fundamental human rights which are severely violated and there are considered to not exist because they contradict the law of the Islamists. )
Posts
