NASA went to the Moon with Apollo 11 in 1969; is it true? Directing?

mixanikos365
Author - mixanikos365
7:27 AM
Columnist: Theodorakis Giannis 
Truth or Fraud?  That NASA was the first to land on the moon, what about the radioactive radiation of the Van Allen Phenomenon ??? If you analyze the data on the internet in America there are two groups
  • The group that FANTASTICLY believes that NASA went to the Moon with Apollo 11 in 1969
  • The group that FANTASTICALLY believes that NASA didn't go to the Moon and it was all staged
Beyond the funny videos and photos in the GRmagazin VIRAL category, this article has delved into the analysis of all the data and presents both points of view in great detail, andyou get analyzes with data, photos, videos, sources,  and  expert analyses.
This article began to be written 6 years ago, has been updated 4 times and data is still being collected. It consists of 2 parts. In the first part, the evidence and the evidence of the first group are analyzed, and in the second part, the 22 points presented by the second group are analyzed.
It is a fact that finally there is the *ANSWER* which has been accompanied by a complete and extensive documentation, with photos, maps, and time lines. Tell us your opinion on the subject and which of the 2 analyzes do you believe is correct!!!


The Answer and Conspiracy Theories

Yes , NASA really did land on the Moon with the Apollo 11 mission in 1969 .

Specifically:

  • The Apollo 11 mission was launched on July 16, 1969 .
  • The spacecraft included astronauts Neil Armstrong , Buzz Aldrin , and Michael Collins .
  • On July 20, 1969 , the lunar lander Eagle landed on the Moon, in the Sea of ​​Tranquility (Mare Tranquillitatis) region.
  • Neil Armstrong came out first and said the famous phrase:

“That's
one small step for [a] man, one giant leap for mankind.”

  • Shortly afterwards, Buzz Aldrin also came out, while Collins remained in orbit around the Moon.

There is a wealth of evidence that the mission actually happened, such as:

  • Thousands of photos and hours of video from the Moon.
  • Lunar rock samples (approximately 382 kilograms) studied internationally.
  • Laser meters (retroreflectors) that were placed on the Moon and are still used for precise distance measurements.
  • Independent observations of the mission from other countries, such as the Soviet Union.

Although there are conspiracy theories that dispute the moon landing, they have all been refuted by scientific evidence and physical analysis.

If you want, I can explain to you what the most famous conspiracy theories are and how they are scientifically refuted — should I?

🧩 1. "The flag was waving, so it was windy"

What the skeptics say:
The American flag appears to wave, even though there is no air on the Moon.

The truth:
The flag does not wave because of the wind , but because:

  • It had a horizontal bar at the top to make it look stretched.
  • When astronauts hammered it into the ground, it vibrated , and the vibrations were sustained longer in low gravity and without air to dampen them.

🎥 2. "The videos were made in a Hollywood studio"

What they say:
NASA directed the moon landing in a studio, possibly with the help of Stanley Kubrick.

The truth:

  • Video technology in 1969 could not realistically reproduce the low gravity we see in the footage. The astronauts' movements are naturally compatible with 1/6 of Earth's gravity.
  • The lighting and shadows match sunlight and reflection from the Moon's terrain — not artificial studio lights.
  • Hundreds of radar technicians from all over the world (Australia, Spain, the Soviet Union, etc.) monitored the signal directly from the Moon , so it could not have been "staged".

🪞 3. "No stars visible in the photos"

The truth:
The mission's cameras were set for a very bright background (the lunar landscape) .
The stars are much fainter , so they weren't captured — just as stars aren't visible in photos we take on Earth during the day.

🪨 4. “Moon rocks are fake”

The truth:

  • The lunar rock samples were shared with laboratories worldwide , even in countries that were rivals of the US at the time (such as the USSR).
  • Their chemical and isotopic composition does not match any terrestrial rock , which confirms their extraterrestrial origin.

📡 5. "We've never been before, so we never went"

The truth:

  • NASA returned to the Moon five more times (Apollo 12, 14, 15, 16, 17).
  • The reason we didn't go back after 1972 was political and economic : the Apollo program was extremely expensive and there was no strategic reason to continue it after the Cold War.

Specific photographs and scientific data (eg analyzes of lunar samples or images of lunar landing sites from modern satellites, such as NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter)

📸 Images of the lunar landing area from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO)

 

Let's see what these images reveal:

  • The image above left (turn0image6) shows the spot where Apollo 11 landed on the Moon and the descent stage that remained on the Moon. NASA Science +1

  • The image above right (turn0image0) captures the “Tranquility Base” with details such as the astronauts' footprints and the paths between the instruments they installed. Space +2 Planetary Society +2

  • The image below left (turn0image1) compares various Apollo missions (eg Apollo 11, 15) and shows exactly where the elements (astronauts, instruments, lunar rover) are located in relation to the terrain. NASA Scientific Visualization Studio

  • The image below right (turn0image3) shows markings such as the "Flag Shadow", the moonlit sky, and tracks around the lunar landing site. lroc.im-ldi.com +1

🔎 What we see and why this is strong evidence

  1. The descent stage
    In the LRO images, the part of the lunar lander that descended and remained on the Moon (to make room for the astronauts to exit) is visible — meaning there is a natural object that descended, it is not “staged.” Space +3 NASA Science +3 Planetary Society +3

  2. The astronauts' footprints
    The images show black lines around the lunar surface that match the paths Armstrong & Aldrin would have walked, to and from the instruments they installed. lroc.im-ldi.com +3 Planetary Society +3 NASA Science +3

  3. The mission's instruments that remained there,
    such as the Passive Seismic Experiment Package (PSEP) and the Laser Ranging RetroReflector (LRRR) , are located in the surrounding area. NASA Scientific Visualization Studio +4 Space +4 NASA Science +4
    They are still used to measure the distance between the Earth and the Moon via laser. NASA Science +2 Space +2

  4. Topography and Geology Analyzes
    Scientific studies have produced geological maps of the lunar landing area using LRO data and data from the same samples brought back by the astronauts. These studies match expectations topographically, geologically, and isotopically. arXiv

📌 In summary: how these images "disprove" conspiracy theories

  • They're not just photos — they're extremely high-resolution satellite images from orbit above the Moon, captured by independent missions.

  • The elements seen (the "descent", the footprints, the instruments) are fully consistent with the records of the Apollo 11 mission and the recorded movements of the astronauts.

  • There is no logical explanation for how someone could "set up" these objects on the Moon and even maintain them with the precision observed — especially in difficult-to-reach places and with the conditions on the Moon.

If you want, I can send you an interactive map showing the astronauts' routes, or show you images of other Apollo missions (eg Apollo 15, 17) so you can see that it's not an isolated phenomenon. 

I could use a virtual map showing the astronauts' routes, or show you images from other Apollo missions (eg Apollo 15, 17) to show you that this is not an isolated phenomenon. Do you want to continue with this?

So let's take a more interactive and comparative look at what happened on the other Apollo missions , so you can see that there are multiple, independent traces of human presence on the Moon — not just from Apollo 11.

🌕 The six missions that actually landed on the Moon

ShipmentYearLunar landing areaAstronauts who walkedSurface durabilityType of evidence left
Apollo 111969Sea of ​​​​Tranquility (Mare Tranquillitatis)Neil Armstrong, Buzz Aldrin~21 hoursFlag, Moon Eagle (base), laser instruments
Apollo 121969Ocean of Storms (Oceanus Procellarum)Pete Conrad, Alan Bean31 hoursALSEP instruments, Surveyor 3 camera
Apollo 141971Brother MauroAlan Shepard, Edgar Mitchell33 hoursRock samples, selenoscope, flag
Apollo 151971Hadley RilleDavid Scott, James Irwin67 hoursFirst Lunar Reconnaissance Vehicle (LRV), ALSEP instruments
Apollo 161972Descartes HighlandsJohn Young, Charles Duke71 hoursLRV, experiments, camera
Apollo 171972Taurus–Littrow ValleyEugene Cernan, Harrison Schmitt75 hoursLRV, geological samples, ALSEP instruments

👉 After Apollo 17, we didn't go again because of cost and political decisions — not because we "couldn't."

🛰️ Satellite evidence from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO)

This satellite, which has been in orbit since 2009, has photographed all six lunar landing sites .
All of them show:

  • The tracks of vehicles and astronauts.

  • The remains of the moon landings .

  • The measuring instruments they left behind.

You can see these areas interactively
on NASA's map here: 🔗 NASA LRO Apollo Landing Sites Interactive Map

🧪 Additional evidence

  1. Lunar samples : 382 kilograms of rocks and dust, with properties (eg isotopic ratios) that are not found in terrestrial rocks.
  2. Laser reflectors : Today we still shoot laser beams at the Moon and measure their return from the mirrors of the Apollo 11, 14 and 15 missions.
  3. Independent observations : Radars and stations in other countries (Australia, Spain, USSR) recorded the signals in real time.

I will show you:

  • 🛰️ detailed image of Apollo 15 with traces of the lunar rover, or
  • 🪞 photo of laser reflectors still in use today.


Here are some of the most striking images from the Apollo missions and instruments on the Moon , along with explanations of what they show — and why they are strong evidence for the reality of the missions:

📷 Image: Apollo 15 — lunar rover and tracks



  • The first image (top left) shows the lunar landing site and the outline of the LRV (Lunar Roving Vehicle) tracks — with its wheel tracks visible.
  • The second image (bottom left) highlights the paths taken by the astronauts during the three extravehicular activities (EVA), as plotted from the data.
  • The third image (top right) shows the different "stages" of the EVAs and the position of the vehicle, the ALSEP instrument, and the lunar lander in relation to the points they explored.

These details clearly show that there was activity on the surface — wheel and foot prints cannot be created in a studio.


🔦 Image: Impressions from multiple Apollo missions


This image combines multiple lunar landing sites (Apollo 11, 15, etc.) as captured by the LRO satellite, demonstrating that in different parts of the Moon there are traces and remnants of the missions.

🔍 Image: Apollo 11 — lunar landing site and footprints


This image shows the lunar lander "Eagle" (in Mare Tranquillitatis), as well as the astronauts' paths to and from the instruments they installed. It is impressive that these very fine traces can be identified through satellite images, making it highly unlikely that they were all set up on Earth's soil.

🪞 Image: Apollo 15 Laser Reflector (LRRR)

2

This image highlights the location of the Lunar Laser Ranging RetroReflector (LRRR) left on the Moon from the Apollo 15 mission.

  • The reflector is one of the instruments that still operates today : scientific stations on Earth fire laser beams towards the Moon and measure their return, achieving an accuracy of a few centimeters.
  • The image incorporates the Falcon descent stage, the LRV, and the ALSEP instruments, colored and labeled to show their relative positions.

This instrument could not simply be "staged," because laser measurements continue to operate and confirm its stable location on the Moon's surface.

🔁 Why these images "lock" the moon landing theory

  • Consistent topography : The landscapes, the craters, the antiskies, the lunar landings — all match the mission's analyzes and inventories.
  • Precise alignment : The paths shown match the time-lapses of the EVAs and the photographic missions.
  • Independent instruments : The reflector is an instrument that has been used for decades for scientific measurements.
  • Analogous expansion to other missions : It's not just Apollo 11 — Apollo 12, 14, 16, 17 now have images and tracks that agree with the mission history.

Check out NASA's interactive map where you can go "inside" the lunar landing sites, zoom in and measure — it's pretty impressive. 

So there you have it — here's NASA's official interactive map of all the moon landing sites from Apollo 11 through 17 , as captured by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO):

🔗 NASA LRO Apollo Landing Sites Interactive Map

🛰️ What you can do on the map:

  • Zoom in on each area (Apollo 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17).
  • Check out the high-resolution photos from LRO — you'll clearly see the astronauts' footprints, the lunar rover bases, and the instruments they left behind.
  • Compare the paths with EVA (extravehicular activities) data recorded in 1969–1972.
  • Click on each "point of interest" for information from NASA itself (eg ALSEP, LRRR, flag, etc.).

💡 Interesting:

If you look at the Apollo 15 (Hadley Rille) area, you will see:

  • Lunar Rover tracks — they're like lines running across the landscape.
  • Location of the lunar lander "Falcon" and the ALSEP instruments left behind.
  • The LRRR (laser reflector) still used today by Earth.

This map is one of the most compelling pieces of evidence that humans actually walked on the Moon — because it shows:

  • Real objects measurable even now.
  • Consistency with the astronauts' records.
  • Data collected by an independent mission , decades later (LRO launched in 2009).

Do you want me to show you the  measurements of the Earth-Moon distance with the Apollo 11 laser reflector ? It's a really cool little physics experiment that can still be done today.

So let's see how the experiment of measuring the Earth-Moon distance is done with the laser reflector (LRRR) left by the Apollo 11 astronauts (and later the Apollo 14 and 15 missions).

🪞 What is a laser reflector (LRRR)?

The Lunar Laser Ranging RetroReflector is a set of mirrors (prisms) that reflect a beam of light exactly back towards its source — regardless of the angle of incidence.
So if you shoot a laser from Earth at it, the beam bounces back in the same direction , allowing for very precise time and distance measurements.

🔭 How is the experiment done?

  1. A laser station on Earth (such as at the Observatoire de la Côte d'Azur in France or the Apache Point Observatory in the USA)
  2. emits a laser pulse towards the reflector on the Moon.
  3. The laser travels approximately 384,400 km until it reaches the Moon.
  4. The pulse is reflected off the LRRR mirror and returns back to Earth.
  5. Scientists measure the time it took the beam to go there and back.

⚙️ The calculation

The average speed of light is:

c = 299 792 458  m/s  c = 299\,792\,458 \text{m/s}

If we measure that the pulse returns in about 2.56 seconds , the distance is:

Distance= c ×t 2 \ text { Distance } = \frac{c \times t}{2} ⇒ 299 792 458 × 2.56  2 ≈ 383 730 000  meters \ Rightarrow  \frac{299\,792\,458 \times 2.56}{2} ≈ 383\,730\,000 \text{ meters }

That is about 384,000 km — the same as the known average distance between Earth and the Moon! 🌕

🧠 What did we learn from this experiment?

Thanks to these reflectors:

  • We measure the Earth-Moon distance with centimeter accuracy .
  • We observe that the Moon is moving away by ~3.8 cm per year .
  • We confirm the theory of relativity and tidal interactions between Earth and Moon.

Look at the simulation and your total expenses are above:

  • An example calculation: with a round-trip time of 2.56 s I calculated a distance of ≈ 383,734,346 km .
  • I also showed you a table (which opened in table format) with various example distances (360,000–410,000 km) and the corresponding round-trip times, and a graph showing the relationship distance ↔ time (I put the measured example as a point on top).


Honestly, there are some decent and common questions about the Apollo moon landings that I thought we should check out for ourselves. Because there's no doubt that things from the Apollo program seem unusual and literally foreign to us in all other contexts.

The Truth About The Moon Landings

Conspiracy Theories in Detail

THE FRAUD?
Claiming that the entire NASA mission to the moon was a well-directed photo-cinematic production of the then technological development of the United States, we present below, in combination with the videos,  evidence  proving that man NEVER set foot on the moon.

1. Lack of stars in photos

They forgot to put stars in the scene, observing the sky from the lunar environment is considered ideal for astronomical and telescopic observation due to the lack of atmosphere, (the dream of every astrophysicist). The sky from the lunar surface should be almost 100 times clearer in stars than that of the earth. Therefore, in NASA photos from the moon there is not a single star in the lunar sky.

2. Waving flag

The filmmakers are clueless  about the moon's atmosphere, and the flag of the United States waves proudly in the videos shown to us by NASA. The waving of the flag is considered as irrefutable proof that the entire scene of the video was shot in an environment where there can be wind, that is, in conditions of an earthly environment and not a lunar one, where there is not even an atmosphere .

3. Lack of Blast Crater from the Moon

Both in the videos and in the NASA photos, there are no traces of the marks left by the lunar lander during the lunar landing, ( Blast Crater ). In order to land on the moon, the lunar lander had to eject from its nozzle, huge amounts of thrust propellant combustion, for which there is absolutely no trace - sign below the place where the lunar lander is located.

4. 1969 – Cold War

We all know the socio-political situation of the so-called "Cold War" in the year 1969. Americans and Russians were fighting over who would be able to do something first and become dominant on the planet. The Russians were the ones who sent the first unmanned satellite to the moon, but the Americans should not have lost this war. In the 60s there was a well-known saying in the United States: "If you can't make it, fake it".

5. Pre-shipment testing data

In 1969 there were no computers. Everything had to be tested practically and calculated "by hand". Dozens of tests were carried out, both for the landing of the lunar module and for the launch of Apollo 11 in an earthly environment. All of them were failures and perhaps a camouflage for the journalists. A little later and as if by magic, the entire Apollo 11 mission was crowned with complete success.

6. CAPRICORN ONE – Interviews

The same year (1969), a science fiction production titled CAPRICORN ONE was released in theaters. See what the director of this film says today about NASA and the studios where this film was shot.

7. AREA 51

Area 51, about 71 miles northwest of Las Vegas, is still a forbidden and inaccessible area for everyone. The "intruders" whether they are ordinary citizens or curious journalists, are literally threatened by the area's military guards with their own lives. Area 51 is considered the place where the filming of the "conquest of the moon" took place. The mountains of this area and the lunar landscape in general in its southwestern part clearly show this. With a simple use of Google Earth by anyone, the similarity of a crater in this area to the one photographed by the Apollo 11 astronauts shortly before their landing on the moon can be understood.

8. Strange Deaths of Astronauts and Mission Personnel

The tests for the conquest of the moon began in 1966. The man chosen to be the first to step on the moon was  Gus Grissom , along with  Ed White  and  Roger B. Chaffee . Gus Grissom had given a strange interview and made it clear that he was not one to keep "big secrets". All three of them were killed in a NASA test accident in 1967. Following this accident, Neil Alden Armstrong, Michael Collins, and Edwin Eugene Aldrin were re-selected for Apollo 11. In 1967, Thomas Ronald Baron, the quality control and safety inspector for NAA (North American Aviation), also died in a car accident with a train, a week after writing a 500-page report on the violation of NASA safety protocol and the aforementioned accident of the three astronauts. His wife, daughter, and 500-page report were lost in the accident.

9. Moonlight engine noise

Before landing on the moon, the lunar module starts its engine to launch the thruster. At the same time, Armstrong speaks on the radio. However, the noise of the engine is not noticeable, nor does it appear that he has any problem shouting louder on the radio, a noise that exceeds, according to NASA, 140 to 150 decibels.
10 Reasons Why People Believe The Moon Landing Is A Hoax

10. Traces – Astronaut footprints on the moon (Dust)

From NASA photos and videos on the moon, we can see dozens of footprints - traces from the astronauts' boots around and under the lunar lander. The strange thing is that there should not be any dust to which these footprints are due in this particular spot due to the thrust propulsive combustion that the lunar lander emits before landing. NASA, however, explains the fact by saying that the dust that the lunar lander ejected during its landing settled again due to gravity after landing in this particular spot. However, in a detailed observation of the NASA photos, there is not a single grain of sand on the wide round foot of the lunar lander, while at the same time there is plenty of sand a few centimeters further away and around it.

11. Launch of a lunar rover from the moon

The time for return has arrived and the camera that the astronauts leave on the surface of the moon is intended to film the launch of the lunar rover for the return journey. However, there is no sign of propellant combustion in the video, only something like an explosion . At the same time, the acceleration phenomenon is not perceived, but it looks as if the lunar rover is hanging from some kind of rope that is pulled upwards.

12. Photos with a cross

The photos that NASA gave us were taken with a Hasselblad 500 EL Data Camera and an f-5.6/60 mm lens. This particular camera incorporated the “Reseau Plate” technology in which the photos were captured on film that was depicted by crosses, (cross grid), like military cameras and binoculars. The crosses are recorded in each exposed frame and provide the angular distances between the objects in the field of view, as well as security for any alteration or distortion of the film. In some NASA photos of the moon the cross is behind the object of view, which testifies and proves the obvious. That is, that these photos are the product of editing .

13. Van Allen effect

Around the planet Earth there are two deadly radiation zones that lie far beyond the thermosphere. The Van Allen belts consist of highly charged particles that are believed to be trapped by the Earth's magnetic field and are highly radioactive and deadly to humans over an area of ​​thousands of miles. Each zone is shaped like a huge ring, one inside the other. The strongest part of the inner belt is located about 3,200 km. from the ground. Its origin is believed to be due to the radiation or radioactive action of the Sun, while the existence of the outer belt is considered to have solar and cosmic origins. The strongest area of ​​the second is located about 16,000 km. above the Earth's equator. Apollo 11 seems to have magically passed through these zones without its crew suffering any harm and without taking the necessary measures because NASA's official justification was that the Apollo 11 spacecraft passed through the Van Allen belts quickly enough that in this short period of time the astronauts were not exposed and did not receive a sufficient dose of radiation to be considered dangerous. In the video of the astronauts' return there is no "quarantine" intervention for any radioactivity, we simply see the return of heroes as if they were returning from a simple air mission.
The Moon Landing - World's Greatest Hoax? | Free Documentary History

14. TV footage lacking detail

The television footage (video) that NASA gives us is surprisingly very low resolution compared to the photographic material that it provides us, while the technology of both the camera and the video camera are at the same level. In practice, the video, in addition to the image, also provides us with time in relation to space. This is one of the unanswered questions that NASA is unable to answer, but at the same time it becomes understandable why NASA provides us with these videos in low resolution: “If you can't make it, fake it”.

15. Gravity on the moon

NASA assures us that the gravity on the moon is 1/6 of that on Earth. However, if we simply double the speed of the videos NASA provides us from the moon, we are surprised to see that the gravity is assimilated to that of Earth. It is as if we are seeing a normal Earth environment.

16. Multiple light sources on the moon – Photos

On the moon, and specifically at the point of lunar landing, there is only one source of light, the sun. NASA assures us of this, since it admits that no lamps or other types of lighting sources were used during the astronauts' stay on the moon, except for that of the sun. This fact alone makes us think, since there are many photographs in which the object of focus is in front of the sun and between the sun and the camera. However, the details of the exposure of the object are visible in every detail, without shadows and "darkness", which indicates the existence of spotlights and advanced studio environments. This is also confirmed by the "perfect" centering of the subject of the photographs, because the astronauts could not look through the camera, but could simply press the shutter button. The Hasselblad 500 EL camera used by the astronauts did not have a “view finder” and was attached to the chest of the astronauts' suit.

17. Shadows with a different angle

In many photos that NASA gives us from the moon, it becomes clear that many objects such as rocks, stones, but also the astronauts themselves who are not in the foreground, create shadows with a different angle (call) than that of the foreground object. This shows, as before, that studio lighting was used and the environment is not the real environment of the moon.

18. Identical lunar environments on different missions

Identical environments are captured in NASA photographs, although NASA claims they were taken in different places. The same mountain, one alone and the other with a close-up of the moon. The same hill with the same stones crossed by the astronauts on one day of the mission and again the same hill with the same stones crossed by the astronauts on the second day, which according to NASA was about 2.5 miles away from the first. The people behind the photo have even located a stone that they identified and confirmed as the same stone on two different NASA missions to the moon and in different locations. The proof that this is a studio seems to be the only explanation. And for the same studio, in the same area of ​​Area 51.
The Dark Side of the Moon | Stanley Kubrick | and the Fake Lunar Landings

19. Astronaut suits

According to scientific studies, both the Apollo 11 spacecraft and the lunar rover should have had a 6-foot or 1.8-meter special protective wall to protect the astronauts both due to the Van Allen effect and for the purely radioactive radiation of the sun on the surface of the moon that comes from the so-called solar-magnetic storms. On the contrary, the astronauts' suits, who walk carefree on the surface of the moon, have absolutely no protection. They are made of simple aluminum sheets that scientifically do not provide any protection from radiation to the astronauts.

20. Russian questions and interviews

The Russians' scientific justification for never sending a man to the moon is related to the previous issue. They are still unable to find a way to overcome the dangers of the Van Allen radiation and the radioactive environment of the moon in order to safely send a man to the moon, something that the Americans managed to do effortlessly and without protection in 1969. Watch the interview of the Russian cosmonaut on this topic in the video.

21. No plans to return to the moon

In 1969, NASA claims to have succeeded in sending a man to the moon for the first time, specifically on July 20, 1969 with Apollo 11. By 1972, 5 other NASA missions had achieved the same thing: On November 19, 1969 with Apollo 12, on February 5, 1971 with Apollo 14, on July 30, 1971 with Apollo 15, on April 20, 1972 with Apollo 16, and on December 11, 1972 with Apollo 17. All missions were completely successful and NASA scientists were never troubled by the issue of radioactivity and the protection of astronauts from it . Since then, there have been no plans by either the Americans or any other nation to return to the moon. The attempt by scientists from other countries is considered extremely dangerous and even with today's technology is considered surprisingly difficult, with only a 10% success rate. However, NASA in 1969, without computers or tests, managed to do it 6 times, and without the slightest loss.

22. Testimonies

One of the astronauts of the Apollo 11 mission, Edwin "Buzz" Aldrin, confirmed that the Apollo 11 mission was "fake"!
In a burst of honesty, Edwin Aldrin admitted that all the videos of the mission are not real and simply show a setup, a set-up to make it look like a simulation of what the moon and space look like,
"The Apollo 11 mission wasn't real, none of it was," Buzz Aldrin said in a video he recorded, admitting that Apollo 11 was a big hoax.
"I'm ashamed to say this, but I can't hide it anymore," Buzz says. "It was a setup, like the ones they use in Hollywood movies, back in the '60s. It was the Cold War era.
The United States was competing with the Soviet Union for spaceflight supremacy, known as the “space race.” We were afraid that the Soviets would beat us to the moon first, so we decided to fake the Apollo 11 moon landing so that the whole world would admit that we were bigger than the Soviets.”
This explains the claims that have been made from time to time that NASA "wrote" over the mission's tapes, resulting in the loss of the audiovisual material. How is it possible for a global organization to make such a childish mistake?
Buzz decided to talk about the Apollo 11 mission on Twitter, which mysteriously disappeared a day after it was posted! It is believed that the CIA demanded that Twitter administrators delete Buzz Aldrin's tweet.


23. "Currently the chances of a successful mission to the moon are only 10% with the biggest problem being survival from the Van Allen radiation ."

This topic is open to controversy and fanaticism between supporters and critics of the moon truth theory. In general, there are fanatical Americans of the moon truth theory who practice the moon truth theory as a profession to make money and become famous, they write books, give seminars, make social media videos.

Reblog:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4hx0qMfK70c
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8pUOcVnyg4o
LINKS: http://sibrel.com/ http://www.thesleuthjournal.com/consp... https://www.youtube.com/user/BartSibrel1 http://thelip.tv/ http://thelip.tv/show/buzzsaw/ Buzzsaw Full Episodes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=72PTX... Buzzsaw Short Clips Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q0AvW... https://www.facebook.com/EnterTheBuzz... https://www.facebook.com/thelip.tv http://www.youtube.com/theliptv


EPISODE BREAKDOWN: 00:01Welcoming Bart Sibrel to Buzzsaw. 01:08Questioning the moon landing from an early age. 05:13The faking of the moon landing proved by unedited footage. 06:54Footage of the Earth from NASA. 08:52Reasons the lunar landing was not possible--from logic to radiation. 13:10Faking only just enough to make it believable. 15:43Theories of a secret space program, and UFOs from Earth. 20:53Motivation for the fake landing. 22:20Stanley Kubrick and the moon landing. 24:25CAPRICORN ONE, and the Hollywood conspiracy to brainwash the world. 29:35Has it all been staged? Ongoing material from NASA. 31:35Profiting in the government, black programs, and government UFOs. 33:22Finding more of Sibrel's work. 35:40Thank you and goodbye.

Tags

You may like these posts

Show more

News and Tweets...

#buttons=(Accept !) #days=(20)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. Learn More
Accept !
Share to other apps
Copy Post Link